Friday, April 18, 2008

bloodsport

Singing, for me, is one of those “challenge” activities. Other people may scale cliffs or jump out of airplanes; I choose to sing. Just like the gymnast driven to repeat skills until they may be executed with exacting precision, so do I approach my weekly choir rehearsals. I probably won’t make the cut for the Olympic team, but I thrill to the exhausting exercise of trying to get it right.

Choral singing, my sport of choice, is team sport. Part of getting it right is having the patience and the interest to quietly, nay silently, support the other sections when the focus shifts to them. It may take the basses (or tenors, or altos) ten minutes to knock the rough edges off this or that particular phrase as the night slowly slides from nine to nine-thirty and everyone has less energy and less patience. Developing the stamina to listen attentively to the instruction being given to someone else, then applying the key bits of information to what you yourself are singing is a hard fought goal where the offensive and defensive lines must work together.

Last night’s choir rehearsal, in my humble opinion and from my narrow perspective, was what sports announcers might call a massacre. It was the sort of vicious bloodletting that I normally associate with cockfighting and figure skating. Mind you, the singers were for the most part well-behaved amongst themselves. Inevitably, we had the requisite amount of passive-aggressive scheming. There were the usual and expected stiff arm maneuvers to secure the optimal seat with an unobstructed view of the conductor, enough light to read the music, and enough distance from the person who drives you straight over the garden wall that you don’t have to sit thigh to thigh with them. All in all, it was your basic Thursday night. No, the choristers were not the victims of yesterday’s exsanguinations.

Nor, as you might expect, was the conductor the object of the brutal attack waged between dinner and the evening news. Last evening’s rehearsal was conducted by the leonine assistant organist, a veritable tomcat of a musician, who valiantly endures these weekly skirmishes with the exasperated patience of a tabby trapped under a toddler. And, in fact, when he bares his claws or shows his fangs as he did yesterday, he does so with predatory restraint. Fear not for the assistant organist; he can fend for himself.

It was music herself who was so cruelly assaulted last night.

I cannot claim to have been in raptures over the music chosen. Earth Day is this weekend and we’re having a gluttonous feast of some sticky sweet pieces. I have never liked All things bright and beautiful. I don’t like the hymn setting. I’m not enthusiastic about the Rutter setting we’re singing this Sunday, which I know well and wickedly lampooned in a staff meeting earlier in the week. However as much as I may disdain the text itself, I don’t believe it merits the clumsy, jackbooted tread of nearly a score of wannabe Wagnerian sopranos marching across the melody line in a vain push to the sea. This puff pastry piece, so easily rendered a treacle-laden glob, instead became a battering ram. Ouch.

What came next was like a scene from a slasher film as Mary thro’ the garden went with a chain saw. Of the three anthems we worked on, this Stanford composition was the only one which was new for me and I was looking forward to getting a little meat along with the sugar cookie Earth Day repertoire. I wasn’t expecting to hear the soprano section rip the haunches from the score and proceed to devour them with wild smacking of gums and gnashing of teeth, tearing up the earth and leaving behind a blood soaked field. Mary was chased trembling through the garden by maniacal, hatchet-wielding sopranos screaming for gory revolution. Somehow I don’t think we quite managed the air of hushed expectancy evoked by the image of the Magdalene woman hurrying toward the tomb. Rather, I suspect our banshee wail would have terrified even Christ himself on that first Easter morn.

The final insult of the evening was again dealt to Mr. Rutter. Poor bastard, he never saw it coming. In an evening strewn with carnage, there was, I suppose, no hope of salvaging anything For the beauty of the earth. Having labored intensely for 90 minutes (because, let’s face it, slaughter is no easy work), we stumbled mightily over this straight-forward hymn anthem and crushed it in the process. No conquering army in history has ever managed to so successfully vanquish the opposition—without actually bringing them into submission—as we were able to do last night. Our scorched earth approach assures that never again will the easy strains of this simple melody float through the skies without being bombarded by friendly fire. Twice through in rapid succession and all that was left were the tattered remains of a once beloved tune.

I love singing, truly I do. And, hard as it may be to believe after my hyperbolic report of the evening’s activities, I am coming to really enjoy this group. Still, I’m wondering if this is really the right place for me. I need the discipline, the challenge. I’m never going to run marathons, or ski cross country, or win game, set and match. Singing is what gets my heart rate up and causes adrenaline to course through my veins. I’ve just never really thought of it as a bloodsport.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Disciples of Christ in Community (DOCC)

So, we had our concluding Eucharist tonight. In place of a formal sermon each group was asked to appoint a representative to speak on behalf of the group about "what DOCC has meant to us". Yeah, it was exactly as thrilling as you might expect. Please let it not be lost upon you that there were thirteen groups, so even if everyone was very succinct you could expect a 26 minute "sermon", which would then be followed by summary remarks from the Dean of the Cathedral. They were not all succinct. I swear one guy went on for at least ten minutes about his personal growth through this program.
Time and place, buddy. Time and place.

I offered to compose our group statement, based on what was said in our final round table discussion immediately preceding the Eucharist, so long as I DID NOT have to present. They thought this was a great offer and quickly agreed. We went round robin and I took notes, then mashed together a brief paragraph. They loved the text, by the way; they felt it managed to touch on something said by each of the eleven people in the group. When I read it to my group moments before our prep time was up, they turned on me and declared I HAD to be the presenter. Bastards!

So in front of the 150 people--including most of my co-workers, the Canon Precentor, and Dean--gathered in the Chapel of St. Joseph of Arimethea to celebrate the risen Lord, in the ringing tones that ensure every person in the room will hear each and every syllable, this is what I stood up and said on behalf of DOCC Group 7 (2008):

Disciples of Christ in Community was a healing surprise where we found a revealing way of looking at love and an opportunity for God to pour out love upon us. We dreaded the small group, but there we discovered the flesh that knits together the dry bones of lecture. We are now quicker to listen and slower to judge as we get back on track. We give thanks for the discipline of commitment which gave us time to build shared experiences and, thereby, community.


There was laughter and shock and then more laughter. Among those who've listened to me bitch about DOCC since January, there is some concern that "dry bones-ing" the Dean's lectures might undermine my job security. On the other hand, when he got up to make his remarks ours was the only one of the group statements that he directly referenced and, in fact, he said that we got it right. So there.

Still, I may come looking for a handout or a shoulder to cry on if I get pink-slipped in the morning.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

auditions

I’ve been to a lot of auditions. You go in, you show them what you can do, and then you wait to find out if you are what they were looking for. In a good audition you get some feedback, some sort of indication that you’ve caught their interest and hopefully some suggestion about what it is they want; we tend to call this directing. Finding and inhabiting that narrow space in which what you are overlaps with what they want is the holy grail of any audition. My favorite audition story may be from a show titled The Endless Adventures of MC Cat (or, How to Get from A to B). The director was trying different pairings of actors and characters and I was reading a comic role, Slow Poke, a chronically depressed, sexually ambiguous cowboy who’s been on the trail forever. I’d read it through a couple of times and was getting a good response when the director switched up the pairings one more time, keeping me in the same role and giving me my all-time favorite bit of direction, “less Eeyore”. Of course, that was many, many years ago.

Somehow, I once again find myself auditioning. I’ve been a lay reader for several years, and with the move and the new job it simply seemed prudent to get licensed locally in the event an emergency substitute was ever needed. The matter of licensure is only ever as stringent a matter as determined by local custom, but I’m the kind of girl who likes to dot her i’s and cross her t’s. Thursday night I stayed late to attend a lay reader "training session", although there’s been a good deal of discussion in the office about actually using these sessions to help prospective readers discern if this is something they are really called to do. Let me tell you, I was really nervous about it.

Not the reading part, that part’s like breathing; and not the discernment, either, given that I have no intention of joining the rotation of regularly scheduled readers. No, what had me worried was the scent I could catch when the wind would blow from a particular direction that what was really being sought and encouraged through this exercise was an expressive approach. I spent hours at home counseling myself to keep my mouth shut and do what I knew I would be asked to do. I doesn’t matter that I draw a sharp and distinct line between performance and worship. This isn’t about my tastes, or my preferences, or my sensibilities; this is just another part of new job orientation—like the mandatory sexual harassment lecture and the OSHA required workplace safety video.

Except it isn’t. I made it through the opening statement which bore a striking similarity my lecture notes from seventh grade advanced acting: don’t just read your part, read the whole script; convey your particular interpretation; use your voice to help identify who’s speaking—oftentimes several different people in a single passage, so try different voices…and it went on. I kept my mouth shut as three competent readers climbed into the lectern and read with clear simplicity, and climbed down from the lectern looking slightly stunned by the coaching they’d received: make your voice go up and down, make it sound more “awesome”, make it more “mystical”. Then I read; and as I expected, I got the same sort of “let your voice tell me what you think about it” sort of notes; it’s too subtle, make it bigger; push it to the extreme; emote. So, I did. I stopped just shy of the sort of caricatured reading I might do for developmentally challenged toddlers, but well past the way I would read the Word of God in his own house. I got an enthusiastic response from my coach, and encouragement to take it even farther, yes! that’s what he’s been trying to tell us all evening.

That’s when I broke. I told him I could take it a lot farther, but I would never read scripture in the context of worship in the way I’d just done it for him. I tried desperately, and unsuccessfully I fear, to reign in the blazing hostility I felt at being pushed to do something I believed to be so utterly wrong as to border on the profane. He heard me. He challenged me to question the purpose of reading scripture aloud without expressive interpretation; I countered that interpretation was the function of the preacher, not the lector. Here I was, the one in the group who came closest to giving him what he sought and I stubbornly refuse to do it again. I can’t claim that either of us is absolutely right, only that we each held fast to our separate views as we struggled to remain cordial while watching the holy grail slip away.

Not my best audition.

Now, as if that’s not enough, I also made loose arrangements on Thursday to meet tomorrow with the Director of Music and the Organ Scholar for a formal audition to sing with the volunteer choir. I’ve missed singing since I came north. Imagine—or perhaps you don’t have to—that you have a stable exercise routine: twice a week you go into the gym and stretch and warm-up (vocalise), then do a comfortable cardio regimen (working on the pieces you have in your repertoire), a little weight training (the new, challenging music you’re not sure whether or not you like), and you finish the whole workout by rewarding yourself with a some time in the sauna (otherwise known as hanging out with the choir). I’ve had that routine for a long, long time and I miss the discipline.

I made some small noises about singing when I first arrived on the scene, but it can be a dicey thing balancing a musical life with your professional and private lives and I had no idea where to start searching for a choir. As the ache to sing grew stronger, I broke down and broached the subject more directly, making it clear that I didn’t want to be a burden on anyone, but I needed some help finding a place to sing. It would have been so much easier to find a gym. The recommendation came back that I (come by sometime to) try the volunteer choir (at least for the short term) so that the DoM would have the opportunity to assess my skill (and be better able to help me find the right place for me) and (in the meantime) I’d have a place to sing. It made good sense. The trouble was in trying to squeeze myself into the parenthetical phrases; curvy as I am, it’s still hard to do. More time passed, until I was preparing the Fauré Requiem for All Souls’ and couldn’t stop singing Libera me, Domine under my breath. There comes a point quando coeli movendi sunt et terra and we are forced to confront that God leaves it to us to liberate ourselves from our terrestrial prisons; all I had to do to escape mine was open the door. So, I arranged a sit down with the DoM and he outlined for me what kind of commitment he’s looking for from choristers and the details of the formal audition process.

Um, okay. I take this moment to remind myself that nothing worth having comes easy. It’s not that the audition process is so terribly stringent. I believe the phrase he used was that when they started the volunteer choir a year ago they took anyone with a pulse. However, it does, necessarily, require singing. Alone. With him and the Organ Scholar. They are nice guys; I like ‘em a lot, but there is a reason I’m a choral singer. Successfully or not, I strive to blend my voice completely and seamlessly into the larger sound of section and choir. I want to be wholly active in the ecstatic moment of singing and to disappear utterly at the same time. Singing alone, being heard individually is something I’d just as soon avoid and the moment I’d made the commitment to audition for the choir I felt a hollow lightness rising up from my solar plexus. Something of what I was feeling must have registered on my face because the DoM asked why I’d suddenly changed. Anxiety, I told him, akin to the feeling one has before a visit to the dentist’s office. Well, he said brushing aside my nerves, it’s not as though it’s a visit to the gynecologist! Less Eeyore.

Then there are the other auditions, the never ending cattle calls as you try to meet new people in a strange city, constantly searching to discover that narrow place where who you are overlaps with what they’re looking for. I keep forgetting that the audition isn’t over; every time I think it is I get a new note, another bit of direction, and once again I come to the realization that I haven’t gotten the part yet; I’ve just been called back again. This time it’s too broad, next time too subtle; first too sharp, then too soft; make it bigger, but don’t overwhelm us; more depth, but not too complex; it’s got to be personal, but accessible; hold for laughs, but don’t lose the rhythm. Cold readings, improvisations, well-rehearsed monologues that I worry have gone stale. Maybe it’s time for new headshots. Or a new agent.

The trouble is I stopped acting many, many years ago.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

indiscretions

I must confess I’ve been seduced. When it started it was all very innocent, just a few minutes here and there spent lurking over the details of other people’s lives. Then gradually it became a necessary part of my day; that strangely intimate glimpse into soccer games and office parties, movie reviews and fantastic adventures all masked by pseudonyms and code words lured me. Over time is was inevitable, I suppose, that I’d finally succumb to making my own timid forays into their world, leaving behind a quip or a clue about who I was and what I’m all about like some sort of bizarre striptease in which the bump and grind have been replaced by the keystroke and hard return.

I’ve become a blogger.

I tried to resist. Over and over again I hoped to engage in the old-fashioned art of correspondence, but to no avail. Letters were answered only sporadically or went entirely unanswered—never out of disrespect but rather I suspect because we, all of us, have fallen out of the habit of stationery and postage stamps and into the newer, faster, cheaper thrill of the blog. And I miss you too much to let the silence grow between us.

Plus, I have too many stories to tell. Many of them, I fear, are already forgotten, part of the daily give and take of life wherein the bits that add color and texture slip aside in favor of the vignettes that move the plot along. At some point I’ll tell the story of the The Big Burly Croats, or the one about the Mad Hatter’s Birthday Party. There is a saga to be told about the Changing of the Guard, another involves a beautiful scene of revelation on a crystalline night, and an epic tale exists involving dragons and a trio of maidens trapped in a tower. I’ll get to those stories one day, but probably not soon.

I can’t guarantee I’ll write with the same steady pace I have at other times. Nor will I promise an adventure in every exciting episode, but I will try. What I can offer is the waxed and varnished truth of my life as I see it, complete with a cast of…well, if not thousands then at least many. They are one of the reasons I haven’t written sooner and one of the reasons I’m writing now.

I’ve been feeling the nasty itch to share all this with you from the beginning, but much more intensely over the last couple of weeks; like a rash that has spread across my life it has worked its way into all the nooks and crannies. The only thing keeping me from scratching the itch has been the matter of discretion. When I was writing home from outside the country, the people in my life about whom I was writing were no less real than those currently populating my day-to-day existence. However, the new bunch is far more likely to cross your path than the españoles y otros estudiantes internacionales ever were; someone always knows someone. Plus, my current cohorts have a much stronger command of the English language and I’m debating whether or not to include some of them in this discourse. Do I need them weighing in on the way it really happened? What do I gain? Intimacy, perhaps. What do I lose? Privacy, definitely. Decisions, decisions.

How do I tell you about my joy and laughter without ever touching on their sorrow and pain? Not that one begets the other, but with the full understanding that you don’t get any of them all on your own. It’s all shared; there’s always someone else involved. Can I paint you a portrait of the sassy miss who keeps me laughing all day, who placidly listens to the utter nonsense I spout constantly and never lets on she’s smothering a violently intense desire to punch someone in the nose? Or the tender heart in the adjoining office who manages to magically balance blissful naïveté with tremendous strength and compassion? Or any of the darling men with whom I keep trying to fall in love: the charmer, the rogue, the pretty boy, the wounded pup, the trekkie, the teacher, the storyteller, etc.—all of whom are decidedly out of reach and so much more appealing for the breadth of the safety net? Is it possible to let you into my life without letting you into theirs as well?

I guess it will be a true test of my discretion.